What Revenue Processes Should Be Standardized First?
Fix the fundamentals in this order to unlock accuracy, speed, and scale.
By Pedowitz Group RevOps Practice • 200+ GTM transformations
Explore RevOps Solutions Benchmark with the Revenue Marketing Index
Executive Summary
Direct answer: Standardize first what creates one source of truth and predictable handoffs: definitions, lead/account routing with SLAs, stage progression rules, reporting & forecast cadence, and change control. With those stable, add attribution rules, enablement, and experiment governance—then optimize channels and budgets.
Priority Order (RevOps “First Five”)
# | Process | Definition | Why first | Owner |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Common definitions | Lead, MQL, SAL, SQL/SQO, Closed/Won, churn | Eliminates KPI debates | RevOps + Sales/Marketing/CS |
2 | Routing & SLAs | Who gets what, by when, with alerts | Speed to lead drives conversion | RevOps Systems + Leaders |
3 | Stage rules | Entry/exit criteria, required fields | Clean funnel & forecast math | Process & Enablement |
4 | Reporting & forecast cadence | Dashboards, owners, meeting rhythm | Accountability to one scorecard | Data & Analytics + CRO |
5 | Change control | Intake, prioritization, release & audit | Prevents tool chaos & drift | RevOps COE |
Do / Don’t While Standardizing
Do | Don’t | Why |
---|---|---|
Publish a data dictionary and stage criteria | Rely on tribal knowledge | Consistency and training |
Automate SLAs with alerts and queues | Depend on manual triage | Predictable speed-to-lead |
Use one hierarchy for accounts/contacts | Mix competing hierarchies | Reliable rollups and territory logic |
Version dashboards and definitions | Change metrics silently | Trust in the numbers |
Set intake SLAs and a release calendar | Ship ad hoc changes | Stability during scale |
Rollout Playbook (60–90 Days)
Step | What to do | Output | Owner | Timeframe |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 — Align | Agree on “First Five” scope & success criteria | RevOps standardization charter | CRO + Head of RevOps | Week 1 |
2 — Define | Publish data dictionary and stage criteria | Definitions v1.0 | Process & Enablement | Weeks 2–3 |
3 — Automate | Implement routing, queues, alerts, SLA timers | Operational baseline | Systems | Weeks 3–5 |
4 — Instrument | Launch unified dashboards & forecast rhythm | Scorecard v1.0 | Data & Analytics | Weeks 5–7 |
5 — Govern | Stand up intake, prioritization, release notes | Change control v1.0 | RevOps COE | Weeks 7–9 |
Metrics to Track During Standardization
Metric | Formula | Target/Range | Stage | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Definition adoption | Records meeting stage criteria ÷ Records audited | ≥ 95% | Define | Spot-check by segment |
Speed-to-lead | Median mins: handoff → first touch | Hours, not days | Automate | Alert breaches |
Stage conversion variance | Std dev across teams/regions | Decreasing trend | Instrument | Signals process health |
Forecast accuracy | |Forecast−Actual| ÷ Actual | Improving trend | Instrument | Requires cadence discipline |
Change success rate | Changes without rollback ÷ Changes | ≥ 95% | Govern | Version and audit |
Deeper Detail
Why this order works: Definitions and stage rules create truth; routing/SLAs create speed; reporting and forecast cadence create accountability; change control keeps it all stable as you scale tools and AI/automation. With those in place, you can safely add attribution models, enablement programs, territory/quota planning, and controlled experiments—measuring lift on one trusted scorecard.
TPG POV: We standardize core revenue processes across HubSpot, Salesforce, Marketo, and Adobe—publishing definitions, automating SLAs, and launching scorecards—so leadership gets reliable numbers and teams move faster.
Related resources: Marketing Operations • Revenue Operations • Revenue Marketing Index.
Additional Resources
Frequently Asked Questions
Global first, then local exceptions. Keep one master definition set and route regional differences through change control.
As part of RevOps or tightly partnered. Marketing Ops often owns MAP execution while RevOps governs shared processes and data.
Start with simple, agreed rules that explain most variance; mature into multi-touch once data quality and cadence are stable.
Version definitions, publish release notes, and require approvals through change control. Re-certify teams quarterly.
High adoption of definitions, declining SLA breaches, stable forecast accuracy, and few rollbacks. Then advance to attribution and planning.