Skip to content Attribution Models & Types:
Attribution Models & Types:
What Attribution Models Fit ABX Campaigns?
ABX (Account-Based Experience) goes beyond classic ABM (Account-Based Marketing) by orchestrating marketing, sales, and customer success around buying groups. The right attribution models highlight multi-threaded engagement, coordinated plays, and account-level outcomes instead of isolated clicks.
ABX campaigns need attribution that thinks in accounts, buying groups, and coordinated plays. Single-touch models can support simple snapshots, but most teams rely on account-level multi-touch across key milestones (awareness, engagement, opportunity, expansion), plus play-level and portfolio views. The best fit combines multi-touch at the account level, journey-stage views, and influence models that reflect how Marketing and Sales work together in ABX.
Principles for Attribution in ABX Campaigns
Measure at the account, not just the lead — ABX is built around accounts and buying groups. Attribution should roll up touches from multiple people into a single view of account progress and revenue.
Highlight orchestrated plays — ABX relies on coordinated plays across email, ads, SDR outreach, events, and success teams. Attribution models should show how these plays work together, not just channel-by-channel performance.
Weight strategic milestones — First aware contact, buying group activation, opportunity creation, and expansion moments should receive explicit weighting so the model reflects real ABX strategy, not just volume of touches.
Blend engagement and revenue — Attribution for ABX must connect engagement signals (content, meetings, intent) with pipeline and bookings, so teams see both early momentum and closed-won outcomes at the account level.
Respect human collaboration — In ABX, Marketing, Sales, and Customer Success share influence. Attribution models should clearly separate sourced vs. influenced and show how different roles contribute to wins and expansions.
Support decisions, not arguments — The “best” model is the one that helps you make better ABX decisions: which accounts to prioritize, which plays to scale, and where to shift budget next quarter.
Designing Attribution That Fits ABX
Build attribution around accounts and buying groups so every ABX campaign can prove its value and guide your next set of plays.
Step-by-Step
- Define ABX goals and motions — Document how your ABX strategy works: target account lists, buying groups, key plays, and revenue outcomes like new logo, expansion, and renewals. This sets the context for every model choice.
- Align account, opportunity, and contact structure — Make sure your CRM reflects accounts, opportunities, and roles correctly so attribution can accurately roll up touches from multiple people into a single account story.
- Standardize plays and journeys — Use consistent naming for plays, channels, and tactics across your ABX platform and CRM. Map them to journey stages such as target, engage, activate, pipeline, and expand.
- Choose your primary account-level model — For most ABX teams, the base model is account-level multi-touch (often position-based) that weights early activation, opportunity creation, and closed-won milestones more heavily than minor touches.
- Add play-level and influence layers — Overlay an influence model that shows how specific plays (e.g., executive events, outbound sequences, nurture series) contribute to account movement and revenue, even when they are not the first or last touch.
- Design views for each stakeholder — Create attribution views for Marketing, Sales, Customer Success, and Finance. Marketing may care about plays and channels, Sales about named accounts and opportunities, Finance about revenue attribution and CAC.
- Test and refine with real campaigns — Run a set of ABX campaigns through your model. Compare results to rep feedback, pipeline quality, and win analysis, then adjust weighting or rules where the model does not match reality.
Attribution Models and Their Fit for ABX
| Model | ABX Use Case | Data Requirements | Strengths | Watchouts | Best Used For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single-Touch (First or Last) | Basic ABX pilots or executive snapshots where you need a simple view of origin or close drivers. | UTM hygiene, CRM campaign attribution, named accounts defined. | Easy to explain; fast to implement; good stepping stone from lead-based views. | Underrepresents multi-threaded engagement and middle-of-journey plays; can fuel credit conflicts. | Quick stories for leaders; simple reports while maturing data and ABX operations. |
| Position-Based Account MTA | Standard ABX motion with clear milestones: first engaged contact, buying group activation, opportunity creation, and closed-won. | Reliable account mapping, contact roles on opportunities, consistent campaign and play tagging. | Balances early activation and late-stage influence; intuitive for Marketing and Sales leadership. | May still over-credit “visible” channels; needs documented rules for offline and sales-led touches. | Core ABX attribution dashboards used in QBRs and planning cycles. |
| Time-Decay Account MTA | High-volume ABX plays where recent engagement near opportunity or renewal matters most. | Timestamped touch data, stable campaign and channel definitions across systems. | Highlights the touches that keep complex deals moving; useful for long sales cycles. | Can undervalue early awareness and buying group activation that made later touches possible. | Optimizing mid-to-late stage ABX plays and sales-assist motions. |
| Play-Level Influence Models | Showing how orchestrated plays (e.g., “C-level reactivation,” “new market entry”) contribute to pipeline and expansion. | Plays modeled as parent campaigns, linked tactics, and consistent play IDs across tools. | Matches how ABX teams plan and execute; great for prioritizing and funding strategic plays. | Requires strong taxonomy; without governance, data becomes noisy and hard to compare. | ABX planning, experimentation, and portfolio management across plays. |
| Engagement-Based Account Scoring | Prioritizing target accounts and buying groups for outreach and success follow-up. | Unified engagement stream (content, meetings, intent, product usage) mapped to accounts. | Shows momentum, not just outcomes; helps sales teams focus on accounts most likely to move. | Scores are not revenue attribution by themselves; must be paired with pipeline and bookings views. | Daily ABX execution, territory management, and SDR prioritization. |
| Experiment-Based Lift for ABX Plays | Proving whether new ABX plays or channels truly move account engagement, pipeline, or expansion. | Clear test design by account group, control vs. exposed cohorts, consistent measurement windows. | Provides causal evidence that a given ABX motion creates incremental value. | Takes time and coordination; not every ABX play has enough volume for robust tests. | Validating major ABX investments such as new programs, channels, or markets. |
Client Snapshot: ABX Attribution That Sales Trusts
A global tech company shifted from lead-based models to account-level attribution for ABX. By combining position-based multi-touch, play-level influence, and experiment results, they built a shared view of impact for Marketing and Sales. Within nine months, target-account pipeline increased by 29%, win rates improved by 8 points, and ABX programs received a larger share of next-year budget because the attribution story was clear and trusted.
When attribution is built for ABX, it stops being a reporting exercise and becomes a navigation system for which accounts to engage, which plays to scale, and where to invest next.
FAQ: Attribution Models for ABX Campaigns
Short, practical answers for revenue leaders designing attribution around ABX.
What is ABX and how is it different from ABM?
ABX stands for Account-Based Experience. It extends ABM (Account-Based Marketing) by coordinating Marketing, Sales, and Customer Success around the full customer journey. Attribution for ABX must reflect shared influence on pipeline, retention, and expansion, not just marketing-sourced leads.
Are single-touch models ever useful for ABX?
Yes, but mostly as simple snapshots. Single-touch first or last touch views can help executives see origin or close drivers, yet they miss multi-threaded engagement. For serious ABX decisions, account-level multi-touch and play-level influence models are usually a better fit.
What is the best primary model for ABX campaigns?
For most teams, the primary lens is account-level position-based multi-touch that weights key milestones such as buying group activation, opportunity creation, and closed-won. This model balances simplicity with the complexity of real ABX journeys.
How should we treat Sales and SDR touches in ABX attribution?
Sales and SDR touches are a core part of ABX, not an afterthought. Define clear rules for meetings, calls, sequences, and social outreach so those activities are credited alongside marketing programs at the account level, with sourced and influenced clearly separated.
Do we need experiments if we already use multi-touch attribution?
Yes. Multi-touch attribution shows how credit is allocated, but only experiments can prove incremental lift. For major ABX investments—such as new plays, markets, or channels—design tests by account segments to confirm that the program truly changes engagement, pipeline, or revenue.
Make Attribution Work for ABX
We help you design account-level attribution that surfaces the right models, builds trust with Sales, and supports confident ABX investment decisions.
See Where You Stand Talk to an ExpertGet in touch with a revenue marketing expert.
Contact us or schedule time with a consultant to explore partnering with The Pedowitz Group.