What Governance Is Needed for Revenue Processes?
Define ownership, rules, and reviews so marketing, sales, and CS run one predictable system—from stages and SLAs to change control and data standards.
Question
What governance is needed for revenue processes?
Direct Answer
Stand up a cross-functional RevOps council, publish stage and exit criteria, define SLAs and RACI, control changes with approvals and testing, and maintain a shared data dictionary with lineage. Run a weekly defect triage and a monthly metrics review, and version every change. Measure quality via conversion, cycle time, defect escape, and reporting reliability so leaders know the system is healthy.
Governance Essentials
- Clear stage/exit criteria across the funnel
- SLAs for response, routing, and handoffs
- RACI and change control with approvals
- Data dictionary, lineage, and access rules
- Cadence: weekly triage, monthly review
Revenue Governance Framework
Item | Definition | Why it matters |
---|---|---|
Council & RACI | Named owners for process, data, tech, and risk | Removes ambiguity; speeds decisions |
Stages & SLAs | Definition + exit criteria + time targets | Predictable handoffs and forecasting |
Change control | Intake → impact → approval → test → release | Prevents breakage; creates audit trail |
Data standards | Dictionary, governance, retention, and privacy | Trusted reporting and compliance |
Telemetry | Dashboards, alerts, and defect taxonomy | Finds issues fast; guides improvements |
Operating Cadence (Runbook)
Step | What to do | Output | Owner | Timeframe |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Publish stage/exit criteria and SLAs | Process spec v1 | RevOps lead | 1–2 weeks |
2 | Set change control (intake, approvals, testing) | Change SOP + forms | Ops + IT | 1 week |
3 | Create data dictionary and lineage map | Shared catalog | Data owner | 2–3 weeks |
4 | Stand up telemetry and alerts | Dashboards + monitors | Analytics | 1–2 weeks |
5 | Run weekly triage and monthly review | Action log + roadmap | Council | Ongoing |
Metrics & Benchmarks
Metric | Formula | Target/Range | Stage | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Conversion stability | |Δ 90d vs 30d| | Within expected band | Run | Investigate sudden shifts |
SLA adherence | On-time touches ÷ total | ≥ 90% | Run | By stage and team |
Defect escape rate | Prod defects ÷ releases | < 10% | Improve | Replay suite reduces escapes |
Change lead time | Request → release (days) | Trend downward | Improve | Keep approvals lightweight |
Data quality score | Valid records ÷ total | ≥ 95% | Run | Track by field and source |
Expanded Explanation
Revenue governance is about making the system reliable. Document the path a record takes from creation to close and renewal, with stage exit criteria that both systems and humans can follow. Protect handoffs with SLAs and queue monitors. Require change requests for anything that alters routing, scoring, attribution, or stage logic; test in a sandbox or through a replay suite before production. Version every change and publish a short changelog so downstream teams aren’t surprised.
Data governance underpins reporting: maintain a dictionary of fields, owners, allowable values, and retention. Add lineage notes so analysts know where a metric originates. Finally, make governance a cadence, not a document—weekly defect triage to fix leaks fast and a monthly business review to align on performance and the next set of improvements. TPG POV: We implement governance where work already happens—CRM/MAP/CDP—so rules, metrics, and approvals are enforceable, not just slides.
Explore Related Guides
FAQ
Who owns revenue process governance?
A RevOps council spanning business, MOPS, Sales Ops, CS Ops, Data/IT, and compliance—with an executive sponsor.
Which assets should be in our playbook?
Process maps, stage definitions, SLAs, RACI, data dictionary, change SOP, and dashboards with lineage notes.
How do we handle urgent changes?
Use a “break-glass” path with time-boxed approval and mandatory post-change review.
What belongs in stage exit criteria?
Required fields, ownership, time limits, and the evidence needed to move forward.
How do we keep reports trustworthy?
Lock metric definitions, control field changes via change control, and monitor data quality by source.
Make Your Revenue System Predictable
We’ll stand up the council, rules, and cadence—plus dashboards and change control—so teams ship improvements without breaking trust.