How Institutions Use ABM to Expand Research Partnerships
For higher‑education and research institutions, Account‑Based Marketing (ABM) offers a targeted approach to engage key partner institutions, funding bodies, and collaborative networks—moving beyond broad outreach to strategic relationship building, aligned goals and scaled impact.
Research institutions adopt ABM by identifying high‑value partner accounts (other universities, labs, institutes, sponsors), building a meaningful partner‑profile and buying‑committee map, then orchestrating a multidisciplinary run‑book with marketing, business development and research office teams. They apply precision engagement—not mass outreach—using intent signals, tailored value propositions, and aligned success metrics to expand collaborative research pipelines, not just one‑off projects.
Key Elements for ABM‑Driven Research Partnership Growth
The Research Partnership ABM Playbook
Implement this sequence to operationalize ABM for research partnerships and scale institutional growth.
Identify → Align → Engage → Expand → Govern → Measure
- Identify target accounts: Use institutional research goals, funding bodies, geography, and partner culture to shortlist 10‑20 high‑value partner institutions.
- Align internal stakeholders: Bring together marketing, research office, tech transfer, and business development to define partnership KPIs and success criteria.
- Engage with tailored value offers: Create account‑specific outreach (white papers, joint webinars, pilot programs, co‑branded proposals) that speak directly to the partner’s research agenda.
- Expand collaboration footprint: Once initial engagement is successful, map adjacent programs, upsell cross‑discipline collaboration, open new funding tracks or geographies.
- Govern and manage processes: Set up SLAs, dashboards for partner pipeline, contract templates, IP flows, and partner success team oversight.
- Measure and report outcomes: Track partner‑initiated grants, co‑published research, funded projects, and growth in strategic partnership value over time.
ABM Maturity Matrix for Research Partnership Programs
| Stage | Description | Typical Metrics |
|---|---|---|
| Ad Hoc / Reactive | Partnership outreach is ad‑hoc, largely one‑off contacts, minimal targeting. | # of partnerships initiated, no systematic pipeline. |
| Emerging | Some account targeting exists, but processes and measurement are inconsistent. | Pilot account list, defined value stories, but limited scale. |
| Orchestrated | Clear target account list, aligned internal teams, multi‑channel plays, governed process. | # of targeted partnerships, conversion rate, joint funding secured. |
| Predictive / Scale | Institution operates as a predictable growth engine for partnerships: expansion, renewals, co‑funding embedded. | % increase in partner‑initiated grants, multi‑year collaborations, increased share of funding via target accounts. |
Institutional Case Snapshot
Major University Research Alliance
A large research university adopted the ABM‑style approach: selected 15 strategic partner institutions globally, mapped more than 120 key stakeholders across those accounts (research leads, technology offices, funding agency liaisons). They activated personalized campaigns (webinars, white papers, executive briefs) and built a joint governance model with each partner. Within 18 months the initiative generated three new co‑funded research programs (USD > 5M), secured a multi‑year industry partnership across three geographies, and increased partner‑initiated grant submissions by 42 %.
Frequently Asked Questions
Ready to Scale Your Institution’s Research Growth?
Partner with experts to build a targeted account‑based growth engine for research collaboration.
Book Your Enrollment Strategy Call Assess Your Maturity