Foundations of Marketing Budgets:
How Much of Revenue Should Be Allocated to Marketing?
Set a percent-of-revenue guardrail, then validate with revenue math, unit economics, and growth goals. Calibrate by model, ACV, and motion—so every dollar earns its place in the plan.
Use a range, not a rule. Most B2B companies land between 5–12% of revenue for marketing, flexing up or down based on growth stage, sales motion, and payback targets. Start with a percent-of-revenue benchmark, then prove or adjust it using pipeline coverage, CAC, payback, and segment-level revenue math.
What Drives the % of Revenue?
Set the Right % With Evidence
Follow this sequence to translate percent-of-revenue into a funded, defensible plan.
Step-by-Step
- Pick a starting range — Choose an initial band by context (e.g., 5–8% steady-state; 8–12% efficient growth; 12%+ aggressive expansion).
- Run revenue math — Convert bookings goals into required pipeline by segment using ASP, win rate, and velocity.
- Model CAC & payback — Ensure proposed spend delivers acceptable CAC and payback by channel and motion.
- Allocate by outcome — Fund Brand, Demand Creation, Demand Capture, Customer Marketing, and Ops/Analytics before selecting channels.
- Ringfence innovation — Reserve 5–15% for experiments with explicit success criteria and scale rules.
- Publish guardrails — Set movement rules, efficiency targets, and thresholds to pause/boost spend intra-quarter.
- Reforecast quarterly — Shift the % up or down based on pipeline coverage, CAC trends, and payback progress.
Suggested Ranges by Scenario
| Scenario | % of Revenue | When to Use | Guardrails | Primary Risks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steady-State / Profit Focus | 5–7% | Mature GTM, healthy NRR, modest growth targets | Strict CAC/payback thresholds; prioritize capture & customer marketing | Underfunded brand and category differentiation |
| Efficient Growth | 7–10% | Balanced new logo + expansion goals; competitive market | Channel caps; quarterly reforecast; pipeline coverage ≥ 3× | Spend sprawl without movement rules |
| Aggressive Expansion | 10–14%+ | New markets, category creation, or share capture | Innovation reserve 10–15%; strict evidence gates for scale | Inefficient mix; elongated payback |
| PLG / Self-Serve Skew | 4–8% | High conversion in-product; lower sales intensity | Obsess over activation, PQLs, and product analytics | Underinvestment in brand and enterprise upsell |
| Enterprise Sales-Led | 8–12% | High ACV, long cycles, complex buying committees | Account-based mix; enablement; executive programs | High fixed costs if coverage assumptions slip |
Client Snapshot: Calibrating the %
A global B2B tech firm moved from a flat 6% to a tiered model (segments at 6%, 9%, and 12%) tied to pipeline coverage and payback. Within two quarters, CAC improved 15% and pipeline coverage rose from 2.4× to 3.2× while holding total spend near plan.
Treat percent-of-revenue as a starting point. The right answer is the one your revenue math and unit economics can sustain—validated by quarterly reforecasts and Finance reconciliation.
FAQ: Setting Marketing as a % of Revenue
Clear answers for boards, CFOs, and CMOs.
Right-Size Your Marketing %
Model the revenue math, validate unit economics, and align the budget to growth intent—then reallocate with confidence.
Assess Growth Readiness Strengthen RevOps