What is the difference between forecasting and planning?

Forecasting is an evidence-based estimate of future revenue built from historic trends, current pipeline, and customer behavior, while planning is the process of setting targets and defining the actions, investments, and capacity the business will deploy to reach or exceed those numbers.

Why is it important to separate forecasting from planning?

Separating forecasting from planning keeps the forecast honest and grounded in reality. The gap between the forecast and the plan highlights where additional action, investment, or expectation changes are needed, instead of masking risk by forcing the numbers to match.

Who should own revenue forecasting and planning?

Sales often owns deal-level forecasts, Finance usually consolidates the overall revenue forecast, and Marketing and Customer Success contribute to pipeline and retention projections. Planning is a shared responsibility where leaders across these functions agree on goals and the specific actions required to achieve them.

How frequently should forecasts and plans be reviewed?

Forecasts are typically reviewed weekly and formally updated monthly, while plans are created annually and refined each quarter. Many organizations bring both together in monthly leadership sessions to align on reality and next steps.

What should we do when the forecast shows we will miss our plan?

When the forecast shows a shortfall against the plan, teams should revisit key assumptions, identify which segments or products are causing the gap, and design targeted actions to close it. If the gap persists, leaders may adjust the plan and communicate updated expectations to stakeholders.

How does forecasting differ from planning?

Forecasting is an evidence-based estimate of future revenue built from historic trends, current pipeline, and customer behavior. Planning is the process of setting targets and deciding the actions, investments, and capacity you will deploy to reach or exceed those numbers. Forecasting answers “What is likely to happen if we change nothing?” while planning answers “What will we do to change that outcome?”

Principles For Separating Forecasting And Planning

Use A Shared Revenue Vocabulary — Define recurring versus one-time revenue, new versus expansion, and how renewals are treated. Make sure Sales, Marketing, Customer Success, and Finance use the same terms in both the forecast and the plan.

Let Forecasts Be Honest, Not Aspirational — Forecasts should show the most likely outcome based on current evidence, even if it is below target. Plans should describe how you close the gap, not hide it.

Anchor Planning In Forecast Gaps — Start planning by asking where you are over or under target by segment, product, and region. Then build programs, coverage, and investments to address those gaps.

Separate Ownership But Connect Governance — Sales may own the deal forecast, Finance may own the consolidated view, and Marketing and Customer Success own parts of the plan. Use one recurring forum where all parties review both together.

Model Scenarios, Not Just Single Numbers — A strong process shows conservative, base, and stretch cases. Planning should reference these scenarios and explain what actions are tied to each.

Close The Loop With Actuals — Every month, compare forecast and plan to actual performance. Capture lessons: were assumptions wrong, execution delayed, or market conditions different than expected?

The Forecasting And Planning Playbook

A practical sequence to build a clear forecast, translate gaps into action, and keep your revenue plan grounded in reality.

Step-By-Step

Clarify Revenue Model And Time Horizons — Define how you make money (subscriptions, services, usage) and align on horizons: in-quarter, annual, and multi-year views that both forecast and plan will use.
Build A Baseline Revenue Forecast — Use historic performance, current pipeline, retention, and expansion data to estimate what will happen if you change nothing in your current approach.
Identify Gaps Versus Targets — Compare the baseline forecast to board or management goals by segment, product, and region. Quantify the shortfall or surplus for each area.
Translate Gaps Into Actionable Plans — For each gap, define concrete levers: additional headcount, territory redesign, demand generation programs, account-based initiatives, pricing changes, or customer success plays.
Run Scenario And Sensitivity Analyses — Stress-test your plan by adjusting win rates, deal sizes, sales cycle length, and churn. Confirm that the plan still holds under realistic downside scenarios.
Align Roles, Budgets, And Capacity — Tie every planned action to owners, timing, and required spend. Confirm that Marketing, Sales, and Customer Success have realistic capacity to execute what is in the plan.
Establish A Recurring Revenue Rhythm — Create a monthly or weekly cadence where leaders review the forecast, track execution of the plan, and agree on course corrections when reality drifts from expectations.

Forecasting Vs Planning: Side-By-Side View

Approach	Best For	Main Inputs	Pros	Limitations	Cadence
Forecasting	Estimating likely revenue outcomes based on current reality	Historic revenue, pipeline by stage, win rates, retention, expansion, market trends	Grounds expectations; surfaces risk early; supports cash and capacity decisions	Cannot guarantee results; accuracy depends on data quality and stable patterns	Weekly view; formal monthly update
Planning	Setting targets and deciding actions, budgets, and capacity	Goals, strategies, forecast gaps, financial constraints, headcount and program capacity	Defines direction; aligns teams and investments; clarifies accountability	Can become unrealistic if disconnected from forecast or changing conditions	Annual creation; quarterly refresh; monthly execution reviews
Integrated Revenue Rhythm	Keeping plans grounded in reality and forecasts informed by actions	Latest forecast, plan milestones, execution progress, external signals	Creates one truth; accelerates course corrections; reduces surprises	Requires disciplined governance, clear roles, and data accessibility	Monthly and quarterly leadership sessions

Client Snapshot: Aligning Forecast And Plan

A business-to-business software company built plans from aggressive top-down targets while forecasts were created separately by Sales. The result was constant tension and missed expectations. By first standardizing its revenue forecast, then designing marketing, sales, and customer success plans around the forecast gaps, the company improved forecast accuracy to single-digit variance and shifted investments into the segments most likely to grow. Within a year, leadership reviews focused less on debating the numbers and more on choosing the next best actions.

When forecasting and planning work together, leaders can see both what is likely to happen and how they will influence that outcome, creating more confident decisions and more predictable growth.

FAQ: How Forecasting Differs From Planning

Concise explanations designed for revenue, finance, and go-to-market leaders.

What Is The Core Difference Between Forecasting And Planning?

Forecasting estimates future revenue based on evidence and current conditions. Planning sets goals and defines the actions and investments you will make to influence those outcomes. One describes likely reality; the other describes your chosen response.

Should Forecasts Ever Be Forced To Match The Plan?

No. If the forecast and the plan always match perfectly, you lose visibility into risk. It is more useful to show the gap between the forecast and the target, then use that gap to design additional actions or adjust expectations.

Who Owns Forecasting And Who Owns Planning?

Sales often owns deal-level forecasts, Finance consolidates the total view, and Marketing and Customer Success contribute to pipeline and retention forecasts. Planning is shared: leaders across these functions decide how to allocate people, programs, and budget to hit goals.

How Often Should We Review Forecasts Versus Plans?

Forecasts are typically reviewed weekly and refreshed monthly. Plans are usually created annually and refined quarterly. In a healthy revenue rhythm, both are discussed together in monthly leadership meetings.

What If The Forecast Shows We Will Miss The Plan?

Treat the gap as a signal, not a failure. Revisit assumptions, identify which segments are underperforming, and design specific plays to close the distance, such as additional campaigns, account focus, pricing changes, or headcount shifts. If the gap persists, update the plan and communicate clearly with stakeholders.

Connect Forecasting And Planning

Build a single revenue rhythm where realistic forecasts and actionable plans work together to drive confident decisions and predictable growth.

Start Your Journey Evolve Operations

Explore More

Revenue Marketing Architecture Guide Revenue Marketing Index Customer Journey Map (The Loop™) Revenue Operations Services

Foundations Of Revenue Forecasting:
How Does Forecasting Differ From Planning?

Principles For Separating Forecasting And Planning

The Forecasting And Planning Playbook

Step-By-Step

Forecasting Vs Planning: Side-By-Side View

Client Snapshot: Aligning Forecast And Plan

FAQ: How Forecasting Differs From Planning

Connect Forecasting And Planning

Get in touch with a revenue marketing expert.

Send Us an Email

Schedule a Call

Solutions

Resources

About TPG