How Does Alkami Handle Marketing Compliance for Banks?
In most bank deployments, Alkami supports marketing compliance by pairing platform controls—permissions, approvals, content governance, and audit trails—with your MAP/CRM rules for opt-in, targeting, and record-keeping. The result: safer campaigns without slowing funded-account growth.
The Short Version
Alkami can help banks run compliant marketing by enforcing approvals, standard disclosures, audience eligibility, opt-out synchronization, and complete audit history—especially when integrated with your marketing automation and CRM. You keep a single system of record for consent and targeting while Alkami governs on-site experiences and messaging.
Typical programs cover fair-offer governance, rate/disclosure management, suppression logic for sensitive segments, and retention of artifacts (who approved what, when, and where it was shown).
Compliance Controls Banks Commonly Configure
Marketing writes, Compliance reviews, Exec signs off—tracked by version.
Standard terms, rate footers, and state-specific notices reused safely.
Target by products, geography, account status; exclude restricted cohorts.
One consent system; real-time suppression across email, SMS, and in-app.
Immutable logs of offers, versions, approvers, timing, and placements.
Tight scopes, encrypted fields, and retention aligned to policy.
Do / Don’t for Bank Marketing Compliance
Do | Don’t | Why |
---|---|---|
Centralize consent in one system | Maintain conflicting opt-out stores | Prevents violations and customer friction |
Template disclosures & rate tables | Rewrite legal language per campaign | Reduces error and review time |
Document offer-eligibility logic | Rely on ad-hoc audience filters | Supports fair, consistent targeting |
Retain artifacts and approvals | Lose version history | Enables fast exam responses |
QA in a non-prod environment | Test compliance in production | Limits risk during changes |
30–45 Day Enablement Plan
Confirm consent owner (MAP/CRM), data flows, disclosures, and review SLAs.
Connect Alkami to MAP/CRM/CDP; implement RBAC and approval workflows.
Encode eligibility, geo rules, product status, minors/exclusions, and opt-outs.
Validate audit logs, run red-team reviews, publish checklists & runbooks.
Compliance Metrics to Monitor
Metric | Formula | Target/Range | Stage | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Opt-out sync accuracy | Suppressed correctly ÷ total opt-outs | ≥99% | Run | Cross-channel reconciliation |
Approval SLA | Time submit → final approve | 48–72 hours | Operate | By risk level |
Audit completeness | Offers with full evidence ÷ offers | 100% | Govern | Version + approver + placement |
Complaint rate | Complaints ÷ 10k communications | Downward trend | Customer | Segment by channel |
Eligibility exceptions | Blocked sends by rule ÷ attempted | Monitored | Control | Investigate spikes |
How Alkami Fits With RevTech & AI Agents
Alkami governs what customers see in digital banking; your MAP/CRM governs who is eligible and why. Connect them so consent, suppressions, and audience rules originate from one place and are mirrored in Alkami placements. Store disclosures and rate language centrally; reuse across channels to keep legal text consistent.
When you introduce AI agents for service or marketing, apply the same controls: restrict tools by role, log all prompts/outputs, and route high-risk decisions through human review. This preserves exam-ready evidence while letting teams scale relevant, compliant offers.
Further Reading
Frequently Asked Questions
Banks typically align controls to UDAAP, Reg B/ECOA, CAN-SPAM, TCPA, GLBA privacy, state privacy rules, and exam guidance from OCC/FDIC/NCUA—plus internal policies.
Pick one system as the source of truth (often MAP/CRM for cross-channel) and sync to Alkami to enforce in digital banking placements.
Yes—encode eligibility rules, avoid protected-class inferences, and retain evidence for any model or segment used to target an offer.
Keep a packet per offer: final copy, disclosure version, approvers, run dates, placements, audiences, and suppression evidence.
Yes—with human-in-the-loop for risky actions, allowlists for data/tools, and full prompt/output logging tied to your compliance archive.