Forecasting Models & Methods:
How Do You Test Forecast Models For Accuracy?
To test forecast models for accuracy, you hold out historical data, generate forecasts as if you were in the past, and then compare predictions with actuals using metrics like mean absolute error, percentage error, bias, and coverage of forecast ranges. The most reliable programs embed this testing into a recurring revenue operations rhythm with Finance and Sales.
You test forecast models for accuracy by backtesting: pick a past period, hide its results, and have each model forecast that period using only information that would have been available at the time. Then you measure error (for example, mean absolute error, mean absolute percentage error, or root mean squared error), check bias (systematic over- or under-forecasting), and review performance by segment and time horizon. Finally, you compare models side by side, select a champion, monitor error in production, and regularly review results with Finance and go-to-market leaders.
Principles For Testing Forecast Model Accuracy
The Forecast Testing Playbook
A practical sequence to compare forecast models, choose a champion, and keep accuracy under control as markets and motions change.
Step-By-Step
- Clarify The Use Case And Horizon — Decide whether you are testing models for short-term bookings, annual recurring revenue, renewals, demand, or pipeline, and define the time horizons that matter most to leadership.
- Create Time-Based Train And Test Splits — Use older periods to train models and reserve recent periods as a holdout set. For recurring revenue or seasonal businesses, make sure your test window includes multiple cycles.
- Choose Accuracy And Bias Metrics — Select metrics such as mean absolute error, mean absolute percentage error, root mean squared error, forecast bias, and coverage of prediction intervals, then document acceptable ranges for each.
- Run Backtests And Compare Models — For every model, generate forecasts for the test period as if you were in the past, calculate metrics overall and by segment, and rank models based on both error and stability.
- Select A Champion And A Challenger — Promote the best-performing model into production, keep one or more challengers running in parallel, and compare their performance over time to prevent stagnation.
- Align With Finance And Go-To-Market Teams — Review results with Finance, Sales, Marketing, and Customer Success. Confirm that the selected model supports planning, target setting, and board communication in a way executives trust.
- Monitor Accuracy And Refresh Models — Track forecast error after deployment, watch for drift as conditions change, and schedule periodic retraining or model replacement within your revenue operations cadence.
Error Metrics And Tests: When To Use What
| Method | Best For | What It Measures | Pros | Limitations | Cadence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean Absolute Error (MAE) | Comparing models on the same scale for a single metric such as bookings or revenue | Average absolute difference between forecast and actual values | Easy to interpret in business units; less sensitive to outliers than squared-error metrics | Not scale-free, making it harder to compare across segments of different sizes | Monthly And Quarterly |
| Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) | Comparing accuracy across products, regions, or segments with different scales | Average percentage error relative to actual values | Scale-independent; intuitive “average percentage off” interpretation | Can explode when actuals are near zero; sensitive to very small denominators | Monthly |
| Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) | Highlighting models that occasionally miss by a large amount | Square-root of average squared error between forecast and actual | Penalizes large misses more strongly; useful when big errors are especially costly | More influenced by outliers; harder to explain to non-technical stakeholders | Quarterly |
| Bias (Forecast Tendency) | Ensuring the model does not consistently over- or under-forecast | Average signed difference between forecasts and actuals | Reveals systematic optimism or conservatism; critical for board and budget discussions | A low average bias can hide large offsetting errors in different segments | Monthly And By Planning Cycle |
| Backtesting And Time-Based Cross-Validation | Evaluating robustness across multiple past periods and conditions | Model performance when trained and tested on rolling historical windows | Shows how models behave through different seasons and demand regimes | More complex to implement; requires sufficient historical data | Quarterly And Before Major Changes |
| Scenario And Stress Testing | Understanding performance under extreme or unusual conditions | How forecasts respond when key inputs or assumptions are pushed to edges | Helps leaders see risk bands and prepare contingency plans | More qualitative; depends on the quality of chosen scenarios | Strategic Planning Cycles |
Client Snapshot: Accuracy Testing Builds Trust
A business-to-business technology company introduced a new machine learning forecast to replace manual spreadsheet roll-ups. Rather than switching overnight, they ran a six-quarter backtest, comparing the model’s predictions with historical actuals and the legacy spreadsheet forecast. By tracking mean absolute percentage error, bias, and segment-level performance, they demonstrated that the new model reduced average error, especially for emerging segments. The team promoted the model as the champion, kept a simpler baseline model as a challenger, and reviewed results with Finance each month. Forecast conversations shifted from debating numbers to making decisions about risk, investments, and scenarios.
When forecast testing is part of your revenue operations rhythm, accuracy improves over time, and leaders gain confidence using forecasts to make hiring, investment, and go-to-market decisions.
FAQ: Testing Forecast Models For Accuracy
Quick answers to the most common questions executives and data teams ask about forecast accuracy.
Turn Accurate Forecasts Into Confident Plans
Connect disciplined model testing with revenue operations so your forecasts help you set realistic targets, allocate investment, and communicate clearly with executives and the board.
Get Revenue Marketing eGuide Evolve Operations