How Do You Document Campaign Processes in Salesforce Marketing Cloud (SFMC)?
Turn tribal knowledge into governed playbooks. This guide shows how to capture briefs, data models, journeys, QA, approvals, and reporting so SFMC teams can launch faster, reduce risk, and scale repeatable outcomes.
Effective SFMC documentation combines a Campaign Brief (objective, audience, offers, KPIs) with a Build Spec (data extensions, entry sources, personalization, content blocks, automations) and a Runbook (roles, timelines, QA/approvals, UTM & tracking, proofing, send windows, rollback). Version these in a central library, link to the Journey/Automation ID, and archive results with a Post-Campaign Report for reuse.
What to Capture for Each SFMC Campaign
SFMC Campaign Documentation Blueprint
Adopt this sequence to move from idea to governed, repeatable execution—while keeping auditors and stakeholders confident.
Brief → Design → Build → QA & Approvals → Launch → Monitor → Report & Archive
- Create the Campaign Brief: Document objective, audience, offer, primary/secondary KPIs, success thresholds, risk notes.
- Design the Solution: Map data extensions and keys, Journey canvas, re-entry rules, decision splits, and suppression strategy.
- Build Assets: Develop content blocks and CloudPages, write SQL/AMPscript/SSJS, configure Automations and Journeys with naming conventions.
- QA & Approve: Run proof tests, validate links & UTMs, sample data, device/client checks, and record sign-offs in the checklist.
- Launch with Controls: Schedule sends, throttle if needed, log change tickets, and enable a kill switch with rollback notes.
- Monitor: Track bounces, errors, and throughput; verify audience counts and goal conversion; capture issues in the runbook.
- Report & Archive: Publish a post-campaign report: KPIs vs. target, learnings, asset IDs, SQL versions, and final audience size; archive versions.
SFMC Documentation Maturity Matrix
| Capability | From (Ad Hoc) | To (Operationalized) | Owner | Primary KPI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naming & Versioning | Inconsistent names; no history | Convention across BUs with IDs; Git/SharePoint version log | Marketing Ops | Retrieval time, error rate |
| Data Spec | Schemas in builder only | Catalog of data extensions + keys + retention + refresh plan | Data/CRM Ops | Sendability, join accuracy |
| QA & Approvals | Email-only checks | Checklist incl. SQL, ampscript, UTMs, legal, and device tests | Marketing Ops/Compliance | Defects per launch |
| Change Control | Edits in production | Ticketed changes, sandbox testing, rollback runbook | PMO/IT | MTTR, incidents |
| Attribution | Basic email metrics | UTM taxonomy + SF Campaign sync + goal tracking | Analytics/RevOps | Goal conversion & ROMI |
| Knowledge Base | Scattered docs | Searchable playbooks, checklists, code library, post-mortems | Enablement | Time-to-onboard |
Client Snapshot: 30% Faster Launches with Fewer Defects
By introducing a standardized brief, data spec, and QA checklist, a multi-brand team reduced rebuilds and sped approvals. A shared code library of AMPscript/SQL patterns cut build time and improved compliance documentation across brands.
Start with a one-page brief, add a build spec for data and journey rules, then institutionalize a QA/approval checklist—and keep everything linkable by Journey/Automation ID.
Frequently Asked Questions About SFMC Documentation
BU_JRN-Welcome_US_v3). Mirror names across assets, data extensions, and automations.Institutionalize Your SFMC Playbooks
We’ll help you codify briefs, specs, QA, and reporting so campaigns ship faster—with fewer defects and clearer ROI.
Take Revenue Marketing Test Start Your Revenue Transformation