Institutions can define personas for faculty and administration by analyzing key differences in their goals, motivations, and challenges. Using this understanding, institutions can design targeted outreach strategies to address each group's specific needs.

What Matters in Balancing Faculty vs. Administration Personas?

Motivations — Faculty are focused on academic outcomes, while administration focuses on organizational efficiency and financial stability.
Goals Alignment — Create strategies that bridge the gap between faculty interests and administrative goals for optimal institutional performance.
Collaboration — Foster communication between faculty and administration for smoother decision-making and better alignment of resources.
Data-Driven Insights — Use data to identify common objectives between faculty and administration and measure progress towards those goals.

Balancing Faculty and Administration Personas: The Playbook

Here’s how to align faculty and administration for better collaboration and success in achieving institutional objectives.

Define → Align → Communicate → Measure → Optimize

  • Define personas: Identify the unique characteristics, challenges, and needs of faculty and administration.
  • Align goals: Create shared objectives that serve both faculty and administration needs.
  • Enhance communication: Establish open channels for ongoing dialogue and feedback.
  • Measure success: Track progress against established goals using data-driven insights.
  • Optimize strategies: Continuously refine strategies to improve collaboration between faculty and administration.

Faculty vs. Administration Persona Maturity Matrix

Stage Faculty Persona Administration Persona Balanced Persona Strategy
Stage 1: Awareness Faculty recognizes the importance of collaboration with administration, but there is little to no communication. Administration acknowledges the value of faculty input but often operates independently of faculty needs. Both groups are aware of each other's role but work separately without a unified strategy.
Stage 2: Understanding Faculty understand the administrative needs and challenges but struggle to align with them. Administration understands faculty priorities but struggles to create an environment of mutual respect and understanding. Both groups start engaging in basic dialogue to understand the other's goals, but alignment is still low.
Stage 3: Alignment Faculty begin collaborating with administration on common goals, though challenges still exist. Administration starts developing more inclusive strategies to involve faculty in decision-making processes. Faculty and administration begin aligning on certain shared priorities like academic success and institutional growth.
Stage 4: Integration Faculty are actively involved in shaping administrative strategies and vice versa. Administration fully integrates faculty input into strategic planning and decision-making processes. Both groups work in sync on a unified vision, with strong, transparent communication and collaboration.
Stage 5: Innovation Faculty lead initiatives that drive institutional change, leveraging administrative support for innovation. Administration supports and funds faculty-driven projects that challenge traditional ways of operating. Both groups work together as innovation partners, constantly iterating on solutions that enhance the institution's overall impact.

Frequently Asked Questions

Take the Next Step

Ready to enhance your institution's ability to balance faculty and administration personas? Explore the following resources:

Start Your Higher-Ed Growth Plan Get the Revenue Marketing eGuide
Explore Related Resources:
Higher-Ed Growth Plan Revenue Marketing eGuide Revenue Marketing Maturity Assessment Account-Based Marketing