How to Identify When AI Agents Need Retraining
Use reliable signals—KPI decline, policy failures, drift, and tool changes—then fix prompts, policies, and data first before retraining models.
Executive Summary
Direct answer: Retrain when performance degrades beyond agreed tolerances and fixes to prompts, policies, or data quality don’t restore results. Signals include sustained KPI decline versus control, rising escalation or policy-failure rates, concept/data drift (new products, pricing, taxonomy), repeated corrective feedback, or changes to tools/APIs the agent relies on. Confirm with an evaluation suite and only then schedule dataset, embedding, or model retraining.
Guiding Principles
Retraining Readiness Checklist
- KPI drop persists 2+ cycles vs. control
- Policy/brand/accessibility failures are rising
- Data model or taxonomy changed recently
- New offers, pricing, or products launched
- Tool/API behavior or latency shifted
- User feedback shows recurring mistakes
- Embeddings older than freshness window
- Prompt/policy/data fixes failed to recover
What to Fix First (Expanded)
Not every dip requires retraining. Start with the least-disruptive fixes: validate data freshness and field mapping, tighten prompts and guardrails, and re-index knowledge (embeddings) before considering model changes. Use an evaluation suite that mirrors real work—task success, tone/brand checks, policy compliance, and cost/latency—to compare the current agent against a control.
If KPIs remain below tolerance and errors cluster around knowledge updates or new patterns (e.g., product launch, pricing change, regional rules), schedule targeted retraining: refresh training data, rebuild embeddings, or fine-tune components implicated by the failures. Operationally, define ownership, thresholds, and cadence (e.g., monthly embedding refresh; quarterly model review; ad-hoc retrain on major releases). Record provenance, version numbers, and reason codes so you can roll back safely if results regress.
Why TPG? We build governed eval suites, data pipelines, and promotion gates across enterprise MAP/CRM stacks so teams improve accuracy without unnecessary retrains.
Metrics & Benchmarks
Metric | Formula | Target/Range | Stage | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
KPI delta vs. control | Variant KPI ÷ control | Within tolerance or ↑ | Monitor | Tracked per cohort |
Policy fail rate | Failed checks ÷ total checks | Trending down | Govern | Brand/privacy/accessibility |
Escalation rate | Escalations ÷ sensitive actions | Stable or ↓ | Operate | Signals trust/reliability |
Drift score | PSI/KL on key fields | Within bounds | Detect | Indicates data shift |
Eval pass rate | Passed tests ÷ total evals | ≥ baseline | Validate | Run pre/post changes |
Additional Resources
Frequently Asked Questions
Fix data freshness, update prompts/policies, and re-embed knowledge; re-run evals to confirm recovery.
Refresh on content changes and on a cadence (e.g., monthly) for dynamic domains.
When persistent style or task errors remain after prompt and data improvements and evals confirm the gap.
Gate on stable signals across two or more measurement cycles and require eval pass before promoting a retrain.
Sometimes. Start with tool-use prompts and simulations; retrain only if errors persist after policy and prompt updates.