How Do Agencies Define Personas for CMOs vs. Brand Managers?
High-performing agencies don’t use a single “marketing leader” persona. They build distinct, research-backed personas for CMOs and brand managers that reflect different goals, decision power, KPIs, and buying triggers—then activate them consistently across campaigns, content, and sales plays.
Agencies define personas for CMOs and brand managers by combining qualitative interviews, CRM and campaign data, and opportunity analysis to separate executive, portfolio-level needs from day-to-day brand ownership. A CMO persona centers on revenue, profitability, and transformation, while a brand manager persona focuses on brand health, campaign performance, and audience insight. The result is two linked personas: shared company context, but different goals, success metrics, decision roles, objections, and content preferences that guide messaging, offers, and sales enablement.
What Really Changes Between CMO and Brand Manager Personas?
The CMO vs. Brand Manager Persona Playbook
Use this sequence to move from generic “marketing leader” personas to differentiated CMO and brand manager personas that your teams can actually activate in pitches, proposals, and campaigns.
Research → Segment → Map Roles → Build → Validate → Activate → Measure
- Research stakeholder reality: Interview CMOs, brand leaders, and their teams across a mix of industries and deal sizes. Capture goals, pressures, success stories, and “jobs to be done” in their own language.
- Segment by offering and motion: Group your services and solutions into logical buying motions (e.g., brand transformation vs. always-on campaigns) so every persona lives in a clear commercial context.
- Map the buying committee: For each motion, clarify who is the economic buyer (often the CMO), who is the day-to-day owner (often the brand manager), and where other roles like digital, analytics, and finance fit.
- Build CMO and brand manager profiles: Document goals, KPIs, pains, triggers, common initiatives, decision criteria, and red-flag risks for each persona. Include “what they say vs. what they actually mean” for key phrases.
- Validate with live opportunities: Test your persona drafts against current deals, QBR notes, and lost opportunity reasons. Adjust language, proof points, and objections based on real conversations.
- Activate across touchpoints: Align messaging, offers, and content types to each persona. CMOs get vision decks, ROI stories, and executive summaries; brand managers get briefs, templates, and channel playbooks.
- Measure and evolve: Track which persona narratives drive higher engagement, stronger opportunity conversion, and faster cycle times. Refresh personas annually or when your ICP or service mix changes.
CMO vs. Brand Manager Persona Maturity Matrix
| Dimension | From (Ad Hoc) | To (Operationalized) | Owner | Primary KPI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Persona Definition | Single generic “marketing leader” persona for all roles. | Distinct CMO and brand manager personas for each key offering or motion. | Strategy / Planning | Persona Coverage by Offering |
| Insights & Research | Assumptions based on internal opinions and pitch decks. | Structured interviews, win/loss analysis, and CRM insights for each persona. | Insights / RevOps | Validated Insight Count per Persona |
| Buying Committee Mapping | Vague sense of “who’s involved” in decisions. | Clear CMO vs brand manager roles, influence, and decision criteria by motion. | Account / Client Strategy | Win Rate by Role Engagement |
| Content & Offers | Same decks, case studies, and offers for every stakeholder. | Role-specific narratives, proof points, and offers mapped to CMO vs. brand manager needs. | Marketing / Creative | Engagement by Persona |
| Sales & Pitch Alignment | AE preference determines pitch angle; inconsistent role coverage. | Standard discovery, pitch, and objection handling paths for CMOs vs brand managers. | Sales / Enablement | Stage-to-Stage Conversion |
| Measurement & Governance | Personas created once, then forgotten. | Personas reviewed annually with performance data and client feedback. | RevOps / Leadership | Revenue Influenced by Persona-Led Motions |
Client Snapshot: Separating CMO and Brand Manager Personas to Unlock Bigger Deals
A global agency serving multi-brand consumer companies treated “marketing leadership” as one persona. CMOs heard tactical channel talk, while brand managers heard high-level transformation messaging—neither persona felt truly understood. We helped them develop distinct CMO and brand manager personas for their core offerings, then rebuilt pitch narratives, proof points, and follow-up content around each role. Within two quarters, opportunities with both personas actively engaged showed higher proposal acceptance, shorter cycle times, and larger multi-brand scopes.
Treat personas as a revenue artifact, not a branding exercise: align CMO and brand manager personas to your real offerings, real buying committees, and real data—then use them to shape strategy, storytelling, and service design.
Frequently Asked Questions About CMO vs. Brand Manager Personas
Turn CMO & Brand Manager Personas Into Revenue Plays
We help agencies and business services firms turn fuzzy personas into clear, role-based narratives that win executive sponsorship and make brand teams excited to execute.
Measure Your Revenue-Marketing Readiness Talk to an Expert